Jake, a 17-year-old student with autism and ADHD attending Mt. Carmel High School in San Diego County, was looking forward to learning essential life skills through a federally funded transition program. Skills like goal-setting, apartment hunting, resume writing, and banking – the building blocks for independent adult living that don't come naturally to students navigating disabilities.

That future disappeared overnight on February 12, 2025, when his school district received notice that federal funding for the "Charting My Path for Future Success" program had been abruptly terminated. Jake's specialized training ended immediately, his teachers were reassigned the next morning, and his carefully planned transition to adulthood became uncertain.

Jake's story represents a national crisis unfolding across special education programs as the current administration implements sweeping cuts to federal education research and training initiatives. These cuts extend far beyond individual students, striking at the heart of the infrastructure that supports the most vulnerable learners in our education system.

The Scope of Federal Education Cuts

The Department of Education has terminated over $600 million in teacher training grants, affecting programs nationwide that specifically address the acute shortage of special education teachers. Additionally, the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has halted 89 education research projects totaling $881 million, many focused on improving instruction for struggling students and those with disabilities.

The cuts have also eliminated 10 regional research laboratories that conduct research for states and local schools, shuttered four equity assistance centers that provide teacher training, and terminated nearly 100 teacher training grants nationwide. The administration justified these cuts by stating the programs were "deemed to be inconsistent with, and no longer effectuates, Department priorities."

California's Special Education Crisis

California serves nearly 840,000 students with disabilities, making these federal cuts particularly devastating. Three major Special Education Local Plan Areas (SELPAs) have reported significant funding losses:

• Tulare County SELPA: Losing approximately $10 million

• San Diego's South County SELPA: $4.1 million in cuts

• West San Gabriel SELPA: Up to $650,000 in lost funding

These cuts are being challenged in federal court, but the immediate impact on teacher training programs has already begun.

The Teacher Shortage Crisis Deepens

Special education already faces a critical teacher shortage, with approximately 70 percent of public schools reporting special education teacher vacancies and about half of special education teachers leaving the profession within their first five years. The federal cuts eliminate key programs designed to address this shortage.

In California's West San Gabriel Valley, a teacher residency program that supported 27 special education teacher candidates will now be cut in half. The annual stipend for remaining residents drops from $37,000 to $27,000, and the program coordinator position has been eliminated entirely. This program was specifically designed to create a pipeline of qualified special education teachers in high-need areas.

"When districts are unable to fill openings for these positions, they either hire teachers who are not fully credentialed or long-term substitutes," explains Tamara Schiern, executive director of the West San Gabriel Valley SELPA.

The Real-World Impact on Students

The human cost of these cuts extends far beyond statistics. Stacey McCrath-Smith, director of special education at Poway Unified, describes the immediate aftermath of funding termination: "It was very upsetting to our staff. It was hard to explain to families and parents." Four teachers who were being trained to help disabled teens transition to adulthood were immediately reassigned to other positions, despite early signs of program success.

One nonverbal student in the program had become highly engaged in career planning sessions in ways he had never been in traditional academic classes. That specialized support disappeared overnight. Jake's mother now faces the challenge of finding alternative support for her son's unique needs, searching for services that may no longer exist or may be prohibitively expensive.

Understanding IDEA and Federal Obligations

The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), signed into law 50 years ago, guarantees a free, appropriate public education to students with disabilities. When Congress passed IDEA, it committed to funding 40 percent of the average per-pupil expenditure for special education services. However, federal funding has never reached this target.

Currently, federal IDEA funding covers only about 14.7 percent of special education costs, leaving states and local districts to shoulder the majority of expenses. The federal contribution for IDEA this fiscal year is $15.5 billion, serving over 7 million students with disabilities nationwide. This chronic underfunding forces difficult choices at the local level, often resulting in larger class sizes, reduced services, or cuts to general education programs to meet special education mandates.

Critical Context: State-level spending for special education varies dramatically, from an average of $24,443 per pupil in Connecticut to just $5,265 per pupil in Mississippi, highlighting the importance of federal programs in leveling access to quality services.

Proposed Changes to Special Education Funding

Beyond the immediate cuts, proposals exist to fundamentally restructure how special education funding flows. These include converting IDEA funding into "no-strings" block grants that would bypass state oversight and reduce federal compliance requirements, or redirecting funds directly to parents through education savings accounts for use at private schools.

Such changes would require Congressional action, as the Secretary of Education cannot unilaterally waive IDEA requirements. However, these proposals raise significant concerns among disability advocates about maintaining consistent protections and services for students with disabilities across all states.

The Intersection with Healthcare Training

Special education services often require coordination with healthcare professionals, making these cuts particularly relevant for healthcare training organizations. Many students with disabilities require related services including physical therapy, occupational therapy, speech-language pathology, and behavioral health support as part of their educational programming.

The elimination of teacher training programs and research initiatives affects the entire continuum of care for students with disabilities. Healthcare organizations that provide contracted services to schools, train staff in disability-related interventions, or develop specialized programs for individuals with disabilities must understand how these federal changes impact their partnerships and service delivery models.

Organizations providing professional development training and safety training may find increased demand for specialized programs that help staff understand disability-related compliance requirements and evidence-based interventions as traditional federal support systems are reduced.

State and Local Response Efforts

California legislators have called on Congress to reverse the federal cuts and have asked the state legislature to bridge the immediate $14.9 million funding gap. State Superintendent Tony Thurmond has indicated California is preparing contingency plans to backfill lost federal funding where possible.

However, state resources are limited, and the scale of federal cuts may exceed states' ability to fully compensate. This creates an urgent need for innovative funding solutions and increased efficiency in service delivery models.

Looking Forward: Implications for Training Organizations

The current federal cuts create both challenges and opportunities for training organizations serving healthcare, educational, and disability service sectors. As traditional federal support diminishes, there may be increased demand for alternative training solutions that help organizations maintain compliance with disability rights laws while operating with reduced resources.

Organizations should prepare for potential changes in regulatory oversight and compliance requirements while maintaining focus on evidence-based practices that support positive outcomes for individuals with disabilities. The fundamental legal obligations under IDEA, Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act, and the Americans with Disabilities Act remain in effect regardless of federal funding levels.

The Path Forward

As Jake and thousands of other students with disabilities navigate an uncertain educational landscape, the importance of maintaining high-quality training and support systems becomes even more critical. While federal funding streams may be disrupted, the legal and moral obligations to serve students with disabilities remain unchanged.

Training organizations, healthcare providers, educational institutions, and advocacy groups must work collaboratively to develop sustainable solutions that protect the rights and futures of students with disabilities. This includes innovative funding models, efficient service delivery systems, and continued commitment to evidence-based practices that support positive outcomes.

The current crisis in special education funding represents more than budget numbers—it affects real students like Jake who depend on specialized support to reach their potential. As federal policies continue to evolve, maintaining focus on student outcomes and rights protections will be essential for building a more inclusive and effective education system for all learners.

Federal Cuts Strike Special Education: 840K Students Face Training Program Losses

Custom eLearning Services